SLEMAN TOURISM VILLAGE CLASSIFICATION 2016

Muhammad Dzulkifli; Milawaty; Uystka Hikmatul Kamiliyah NH; Lely Dian Utami

doi:10.53565/sabbhatayatra.v6i1.1930

Muhammad Dzulkifli
Milawaty
Uystka Hikmatul Kamiliyah NH
Lely Dian Utami Politeknik Negeri Jember

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53565/sabbhatayatra.v6i1.1930

Abstract

Sleman Regency is one of the areas that has the potential for alternative tourism activities. Thus, the development of tourist attractions in this district needs to be considered, especially related to cultural diversity and natural uniqueness. In 2016, the Department of Culture and Tourism of the Sleman Regency held a classification activity for the Sleman Regency Tourism Village. A total of 39 Tourism Villages in Sleman Regency participated in this program. This classification program is expected to motivate the community to build a tourism village. Furthermore, it is also an effort to evaluate and improve competitiveness between tourism villages in Sleman Regency. Another purpose of the classification is to identify the distribution of tourism villages in Sleman as well as to categorize the level of tourism villages based on their development. The research data were collected through interviews, documentation, observation, and using an assessment instrument with 8 (eight) indicators that had been agreed upon by a team of experts as well as the Department of Culture and Tourism. The data were analyzed using simple interval calculations strengthened by a qualitative description of the field observation results. The analysis results show that the classification of Tourism Villages in Sleman Regency in 2016 is divided into three categories, namely the Growing Category, the Developing Category, and the Independent Category of Tourism Villages. Based on the results of the conducted classification, from the 39 classified tourism villages, 14 villages belong to the growing category, 8 villages belong to the developing category, and 9 villages belong to the independent category. In addition, there are 8 villages that are considered unqualified as tourism villages.

Keywords: classification, tourism village, Sleman, Yogyakarta, 2016

References

ASEAN, C. B. T. S. (2014). ASEAN COMMUNITY BASED TOURISM STANDARD. http://ysrinfo.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/7_cbt-standards-in-
Baiquni, M. (2009). Learning the Ups and Downs of Borobudur Civilization and the Concept of Borobudur Tourism Development. Forum Geografi, 23(1), 25–40.
Damanik, J. (2013). Indonesian Tourism; Between Opportunities and Challenges (1st ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Dewi, M. H. U., Fandeli, C., & Baiquni, M. (2013). Tabanan, Bali. Kawistara, 3(2), 117–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.3976
GSTC, Gl. S. T. C. (2013). Global Sustainable Tourism Council Criteria Suggested Performance Indicators for Destinations. www.gstcouncil.org
Harsono, P., & Suhandi. (2019). TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY TO REDUCE URBANIZATION. Jurnal Manajemen, 5(2), 14–19.
Made, A., & Arida, N. S. (2015). LOCAL POTENTIAL-BASED TOURISM VILLAGE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES (1st ed., Vol. 1). Universitas Udayana.
Wilson, S., Fesenmaier, D. R., Fesenmaier, J., & Es, J. C. van. (2001). Factors for Success in Rural Tourism Development. Journal of Travel Research, 40(2), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750104000203
World Tourism Organization. (2004). Indicators of sustainable development for tourism destinations : a guidebook. World Tourism Organization.
Wulandari, L. W. (2014). Creative Economy Tourism Development of Culture-Based Tourism Villages as Niche Market Destination (Case Study of Tourism Village Development in the Regency). Aplikasi Bisnis, 16(9), 2140–2167.