Dimensi Prajñā Pāramitā Hṛdaya Sūtra Dalam Logika Kontradiksi Diri Absolut Nishida Kitarō

  • Galuh Nur Fattah Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Gadjah Mada
Keywords: Prajñā Pāramitā Hṛdaya Sūtra, Logika Kontradiksi Diri Absolut, Nishida Kitarō, Zettai Mu, Sunyata

Abstract

This research article explains the connections and similarities regarding the logical structure in the Prajñā Pāramitā Hdaya Sūtra and Nishida Kitarō's logic of absolute self-contradiction. Essentially the Prajñā Pāramitā Hdaya Sūtra teaches about nothingness or Sunyata. Nothingness in logic of absolute self-contradiction is called zettai mu. In Prajñā Pāramitā Hdaya Sūtra, the teaching about nothingness is explained through a logic scheme of negation or can be said to be the logic of inversion. On the other hand, Nishida Kitarō's logic of absolute self-contradiction also shows the same thing, it can be seen as a logical scheme which is defined as the logic of exception without exception (mufunbetsu no funbetsu) or can also be understood as a point of view without point of view (tachiba naki tachibai) . This logic can be understood as paradoxical logic or paralogism (hairi no ri). The concept of Sunyata in the Prajñā Pāramitā Hdaya Sūtra is basically a mental state that leads to Nirvana, whereas, zettai mu in Nishida Kitarō's logic of absolute self-contradiction, leads to the highest understanding without any discrimination. Overall it can be concluded that in the logic of absolute self-contradiction there are identical dimensions of the Prajñā Pāramitā Hdaya Sūtra, but based on the criticism given by Hakuin and Tsujimura, the core thing in the Sūtra , namely nothingness, needs to be redefined properly and its true meaning understood.

Author Biography

Galuh Nur Fattah, Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Gadjah Mada

Mahasiswa Pascasarjana, Program Magister Ilmu Filsafat, Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

References

Ānandajoti, B. (2013). Prajñāpāramitā-Hṛdayam: The Heart of the Perfection of Wisdom. Ancient Buddhist Texts. https://ancient-buddhist-texts.net/Texts-and-Translations/Short-Pieces-in-Sanskrit/Prajnaparamita-Hrdaya.htm

Attwood, J. (2017). Form is (Not) Emptiness: The Enigma at the Heart of the Heart Sutra. Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies, 13(Buddhist Philosophy), 52–80. https://philpapers.org/rec/ATTFIN

Bakker, A., & Zubair, A. C. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Kanisius.

Fattah, G. N., & Tangrestu, V. (2024). Ketiadaan Mutlak dalam Buddhisme Zen Perspektif Pemikiran Nishida Kitarō dan Korelasinya dengan Realitas. Media Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi, 5, 1(Filsafat), 71–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53396/media.v5i1.267

Gilbert, B. (2023). Recollecting Plato in Nishida. The Journal of East Asian Philosophy, 1, 1(East Asian Philosophy), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s43493-023-00030-7

Heisig, J. W., Kasulis, T. P., & Maraldo, J. C. (2011). Japanese Philosophy: A Sourcebook. University of Hawai’i Press.

Karim, M. S. A. (2018). Kritik Atas Korelasionisme (Analisa Pemikiran Materialisme Spekulatif Quentin Meillassoux). JAQFI: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam, 3, 1(Filsafat), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jaqfi.v3i1.9547

Kitarō, N. (1990). An Inquiry into the Good (M. Abe (ed.); English). Yale University Press.

Kitarō, N. (2012). Ontology of Production: Three Essays (W. Haver (ed.); English). Duke University Press.

Koft, G. (2009). Nishida’s Conception of Person. In Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings (pp. 358–369). terebess.hu. https://terebess.hu/zen/mesterek/nishida.pdf

Kozyra, A. (2008). Nishida Kitarō’s Logic of Absolutely Contradictory Self-Identity and the Problem of Orthodoxy in the Zen Tradition. International Research Centre for Japanese Studies, National Institute for the Humanities, 20, 1(Philosophy), 69–110.

Lu, L.-T. (2022). Five Skandhas, Prajnaparamita Heart Sutra, and Business Management. International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research, 4, 1(Social Science), 21–27.

Matsumoto, M. (1974). The Absolute, Relatives and Nothingness. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 28(Philosophy), 68–81.

Nishimura, E. (1962). On Hakuin’s “Commentary and Poems on the Prajñā-Pāramitā-Hṛdaya-Sūtra.” 禅学研究, 1, 1(Studies in Zen Buddhism), 200–193. https://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/en/journal/journaldetail.jsp?seq=1674&comefrom=bookdetail

Nyoto. (2016). Penjelasan Ajaran dalam Prajna Paramita Hdraya Sutra (Sin Cing). OSF, 1(Buddhisme), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/34qdg

Streng, F. J. (1982). Realization of Param Bhūtakoti (Ultimate Reality-Limit) in the “Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra.” Philosophy East and West, 32, 1(Buddhist Philosophy), 91–98.

Tadisa, P. S. (2010). Penjelasan Singkat Prajna Paramita Hrdaya Sutra. Majalah Harmoni, 1. https://www.majalahharmoni.com/daftar-isi-majalah/edisi-16/prajna-paramita-hrdaya-sutra/

辻村繁一. (1976). 般若心経の表現稚拙と仏教. 印度學佛教學研究, 24, 2(Buddhist Philosophy), 709–712. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.24.709

Published
2025-06-25
How to Cite
Nur Fattah, G. (2025). Dimensi Prajñā Pāramitā Hṛdaya Sūtra Dalam Logika Kontradiksi Diri Absolut Nishida Kitarō. PATISAMBHIDA : Jurnal Pemikiran Buddha Dan Filsafat Agama, 6(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.53565/patisambhida.v6i1.1205
DOI : https://doi.org/10.53565/patisambhida.v6i1.1205