AI INFLUENCER GOVERNANCE IN DIGITAL PLATFORMS: REGULATORY AND TECHNOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES IN INDONESIA
Abstract
Advances in artificial intelligence technology have dramatically changed the way we communicate digitally and the marketing strategies we employ. Social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube are now primary venues for interaction and content dissemination. In this context, influencers play a crucial role in shaping audience views and influencing their purchasing choices. Recently, the emergence of AI-based influencers, digital characters created using technologies such as generative artificial intelligence, computer-generated imagery (CGI), and machine learning, has garnered attention. This technology enables the creation of virtual characters that can create content, communicate with users, and engage in promotional activities independently. However, the presence of AI influencers presents several management challenges, particularly those related to transparency, personal data protection, and the impact of algorithms on content dissemination. This study aims to analyze the technological infrastructure supporting the existence of AI influencers and to identify governance challenges within the digital platform realm in Indonesia. The method used is a qualitative approach through normative legal studies and literature analysis. The findings of this study indicate that AI influencers operate within a complex technological ecosystem, interconnecting generative AI systems, digital avatar technology, and platform algorithms. This research also offers a management framework consisting of three layers, namely technology, regulation, and protection for users.
References
Andre, J. A. (2016). Sistem Security Webcam Dengan Menggunakan Microsoft Visual Basic (6.0). Rabit : Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Univrab, 1(2), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.36341/RABIT.V1I2.23
Bennet, J., & Neuman, M. J. (2007). Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Early Childhood Education: An International Encyclopedia, 572–574. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292548-125/organisation-economic-co-operation-development
Floridi, L. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. SpringerL Floridi, J Cowls, M Beltrametti, R Chatila, P Chazerand, V Dignum, C Luetge, R MadelinMinds and Machines, 2018•Springer, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., review, L. F.-P. relations, & 2011, undefined. (n.d.). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Elsevier. Retrieved March 13, 2026, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811110001207
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media.
Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda. New Media and Society, 22(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691
HUKUM, E. C.-M. P. (n.d.). Penyusunan Proposal Penelitian Hukum. Researchgate.Net. Retrieved March 13, 2026, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sada-Pustaka/publication/372551174_Metodologi_Penelitian_Hukum/links/64be34e4b9ed6874a540fd29/Metodologi-Penelitian-Hukum.pdf#page=32
Kaplan, A., horizons, M. H.-B., & 2019, undefined. (n.d.). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. ElsevierA Kaplan, M HaenleinBusiness Horizons, 2019•Elsevier. Retrieved March 13, 2026, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681318301393
Lou, C., Kiew, S. T. J., Chen, T., Lee, T. Y. M., Ong, J. E. C., & Phua, Z. X. (2023). Authentically Fake? How Consumers Respond to the Influence of Virtual Influencers. Journal of Advertising, 52(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2149641
Natale, S. (2021). Deceitful media: Artificial intelligence and social life after the Turing test.
S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence:... - Google Scholar. (n.d.). Retrieved March 13, 2026.
Silverman, D. (2020). Qualitative research. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5019251&publisher=FZ7200
society, K. C.-N. media &, & 2019, undefined. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. Journals.Sagepub.ComK CotterNew Media & Society, 2019•journals.Sagepub.Com, 21(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684
Syuhada, H., Hidayat, S., … S. M.-R. J. T., & 2024, undefined. (n.d.). Pengembangan gamifikasi pada pelajaran matematika sd dengan metode addie untuk meningkatkan minat belajar siswa. Jurnal.Univrab.Ac.IdH Syuhada, S Hidayat, S Mulyati, AG PersadaRabit: Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Univrab, 2024•jurnal.Univrab.Ac.Id
Wicaksana, I. R.-K., & 2025, undefined. (n.d.). Aspek Perlindungan Hukum dari Pendaftaran Tanah terhadap Pemegang Hak atas Tanah berdasarkan Pengaturan Akta Otentik sebagai Alat Pembuktian yang Sah. Ejurnal.Warmadewa.Ac.Id.
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.53565/nivedana.v7i2.2688
















