ANALISIS RESEPSI KHALAYAK TERHADAP PEMBERITAAN MAKAN SIANG GRATIS DI MEDIA MASSA
Abstract
The mass media coverage during the recent presidential campaign highlighted one of the programs proposed by the Prabowo-Gibran pair, namely the "free lunch" initiative. This news attracted significant public attention. This study aims to analyze the public's reception of the news about the free lunch program. This research is a qualitative study. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews with several informants representing various social backgrounds. Analysis was conducted based on Stuart Hall's encoding-decoding theory, which emphasizes that audiences do not merely receive information passively but also assign their own meanings to the messages they receive according to their social, cultural, and ideological contexts. The results of the study show three main categories of audience reception: dominant-hegemonic, negotiated, and oppositional. Audiences with a dominant-hegemonic reception tend to view the coverage as a positive policy beneficial to the broader society. Those with a negotiated reception recognize the benefits of the program but remain critical of certain aspects of its implementation, such as effectiveness and sustainability. Meanwhile, audiences with an oppositional reception tend to see the free lunch program as a policy that is not well-targeted and does not fully address health issues, appearing as mere political rhetoric.
References
Amaranggana, P. (2024, Maret 31). Ekonom Sebut Program Makan Siang Gratis Lebih Penting dari IKN. Kompas. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2024/03/31/113203665/ekonom-sebut-program-makan-siang-gratis-lebih-penting-dari-ikn-ini?page=all#google_vignette
Avisena, M. I. R. (2024, Februari 27). Indef: Dana Jumbo Makan Siang Gratis Lebih Baik Dialihkan untuk Hal Produktif. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/ekonomi/654781/indef-dana-jumbo-makan-siang-gratis-lebih-baik-dialihkan-untuk-hal-produktif
Cangara, H. (2010). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. New York: SAGE Publication
Erciyes, E. (2020). Paradigms of inquiry in the qualitative research. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 16(7), 181—200.
Fathurokhman, B. (2022). Partisipasi politik pemilih pemula dalam pemilihan umum (pemilu). Journal of Research and Development on Public Policy, 1(1), 51-59.
Hasan, M., Harahap, T. K., Hasibuan, S., Rodliyah, I., Thalhah, S. Z., Rakhman, C. U., ... & Arisah, N. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Kabupaten Sukoharjo: Penerbit Tahta Media.
Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (1972). Coding/decoding. Culture, Media, Language. Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 79, 128-138
Ida, R. (2010). Metode Penelitian Studi Media dan Budaya. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Jurdi, F. (2018). Pengantar Hukum Pemilihan Umum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Kamuli, S., Latare, S., & Sahi, Y. (2023). Implikasi Konflik Partai Politik Terhadap Paradigma Pemilih Pemula Menjelang Pemilu 2024: Studi Pada Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(3), 3158-3170.
McRobbie, Angela. (1992). Post-Marxism and Cultural Studies: A Post Script. Dalam Lawrence Grossberg dan Paul Treichler (eed.), Cultural Studies. London & New York: Routledge.
McQuail, D. (2004). With More Hindsight: Conceptual Problems and Some Ways Forward For Media Use Research. Action Theory and Communication Research: Recent Developments in Europe, 3, 35.
Melati, C., Prasetya, A. P., & Martriana, P. S. (2015). Analisis Resepsi Komunikasi Politik di Instagram @ridwankamil. Imagining e-Indonesia: Local Wisdom in the Midst of Media Technology and Communication Policy, 115.
Mulyana, D. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurfadilla, Y., & Nurdin, I. (2024). Kepemimpinan Kolaboratif dalam Momentum Pemilu 2024 Membangun Partisipasi Demokratis yang Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik, 9(1), 44-49.
Ross, K., & Nightingale, V. (2003). Media and audiences: New perspectives. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Stansfield, M. (2001). Introduction to Paradigms: Overview, Definitions, Categories, Basics, Optimizing Paradigms and Paradigm Engines. Texas: Trafford Publishing.
Sulistiono, S., & Boediningsih, W. (2023). Konsep Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Implementasi Presidential Threshold Pada Sistem Pemilihan Umum Secara Langsung Di Indonesia. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 5(3), 333-345.
Sumual, A. K., Lontaan, M. G., & Supit, Y. (2023). Pelaksanaan Pemilu Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Perspektif Undang Undang Dasar 1945. JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION, 2(2), 103-112.
Toni, A. A., & Fajariko, D. (2017). Studi Resepsi Mahasiswa Broadcasting Universitas Mercu Buana Pada Film Journalism “Kill The Messenger”. Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(2), 151-163.
Umanailo, M. B. C. (2019). Paradigma Postmodern. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. https://osf.io/preprints/dukfs/
Wijaya, A. (2024, Maret 4). Dana BOS Buat Makan Siang Gratis, Gak Bahaya Tah?. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20240304115341-8-519400/video-dana-bos-buat-makan-siang-gratis-gak-bahaya-tah
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.53565/nivedana.v5i4.1422
















